Let’s suppose that a compliance system is worth $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a high price?
The answer is dependent on what it is replacing.
If $12,000 can be used to cut down on hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence gathering in the complex technological world, it could be money that is well-invested. The math would be different for a start-up of seven individuals could gather the same information in only one or two minutes per month.
It’s an effective method to begin your look for Vanta. Asking which platform has the best features is not the first step. Ask what those features will help your business save time and work.
Automation has an economic break-even Point
It’s not intrinsically good or evil. The value it brings changes with. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees multiple cloud environments, many applications, and regular access changes. The effort of manually capturing evidence on a regular basis could be very excessive. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can easily justify their cost.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through its initial SOC 2 audit. It could have a small infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be handled with minimal automation.
This distinction is crucial in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. While a well-developed platform can have many features but they only have value when an organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the features, services contract and quotes offered by both platforms. Both are established systems for compliance that are focused on integrations and automation.
You’ll need to decide on another thing first. Do you require a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain businesses require automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Some companies prefer to collect evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors do not all use the same pattern.
Several well-known Vanta competitors are in competition with a similar focus on automation. There are also platforms with a lighter design that focus more on the system’s organization, rather as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes the framework controls into a single work space and provides editable guidance on policy and evidence. Auditors can review the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It deliberately does not connect to operational systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload their evidence that they want to present.
Be aware of the system access.
It is evident that the removal of integrations could have disadvantages. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
This means that there is no need to integrate, and the process of compliance does not require an interface to the operational environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. What is the best choice for your company?
CertAssist is targeted at companies with five to 200 employees and provides pricing information instead of having a sales conversation. Its official launch price is $225 per month, compared with a regular price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
Today’s needs for a startup with a staff of 10 are not necessarily identical to those of companies with 100 or 500 employees.
The compliance can be maintained using a a simple platform. The costs of automation will rise as the number of employees, systems and frameworks increase. Better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Don’t buy fifty integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. Spend money on them when manually doing the task they replace is the more expensive option.